CELEBRATING MORE THAN YEARS
AWARDS & RECOGNITION
UPDATES
PRACTICE AREAS
PEOPLE
News and Articles
Mumbai Property Registration,
Mumbai Property Registration: Key Legal Requirements Every Buyer Should Know’
Property ownership in Mumbai carries high financial and legal stakes. Completing Mumbai property registration correctly is one of the most important steps in securing lawful ownership. Despite this, many buyers treat registration as a routine formality without fully understanding its legal significance. Errors or omissions during registration can lead to disputes, penalties or even loss of ownership rights. This guide explains the legal requirements for property registration in Mumbai, the applicable laws, documentation, stamp duty obligations, registration process and common mistakes buyers should avoid. Why Property Registration Is Legally Critical in Mumbai?  Property registration provides legal recognition to a transaction and records ownership in public records. In Mumbai, registration protects buyers against future ownership claims, fraud and unauthorised transfers. Unregistered property documents have limited evidentiary value in court and may not be enforceable. Registration also enables buyers to access utilities, obtain home loans and carry out future transfers or redevelopment. In a city with complex property histories, registration acts as a safeguard against uncertainty. Mumbai Property Registration and the Legal Framework Mumbai property registration is governed by the Registration Act and the Maharashtra Stamp Act. These laws mandate registration of specified documents and payment of stamp duty before or at the time of registration. The Department of Registration and Stamps, Government of Maharashtra oversees the registration process through Sub Registrar offices across Mumbai. Digital initiatives have streamlined appointments, payments and document uploads, but legal compliance remains essential. Registration does not validate title on its own, but it provides statutory recognition to the transaction. Documents That Require Mandatory Registration Sale deeds, gift deeds, release deeds, exchange deeds and certain development agreements require compulsory registration. Agreements for sale must also be registered under Maharashtra law. Documents creating or extinguishing rights in immovable property must be registered to be legally effective. Failure to register such documents renders them inadmissible as evidence in most legal proceedings. Buyers should ensure all title transferring documents are registered. Stamp Duty and Its Role in Registration Stamp duty is a tax levied on property transactions and is calculated based on market value or agreement value, whichever is higher. Registration cannot proceed without proper stamp duty payment. Incorrect payment attracts penalties and delays. Stamp duty rates vary based on location, nature of transaction and relationship between parties. Buyers should confirm applicable rates and concessions before execution. Who Can Present Documents for Registration? The buyer, seller or their authorised representatives may present documents for registration. Authorisation must be supported by a valid power of attorney. Both parties must appear before the Sub Registrar with identity proof and photographs. Witnesses are also required for execution. Biometric verification is part of the process.  Step by Step Registration Process in Mumbai The process begins with preparation of the final document after payment of stamp duty. Parties then book an appointment at the jurisdictional Sub Registrar office. On the scheduled date, parties execute the document, complete biometric verification and submit supporting documents. Once accepted, the document is registered and a receipt is issued. Certified copies can be obtained later for records. Online Registration Facilities in Maharashtra The Maharashtra government offers online facilities for appointment booking, stamp duty payment and document uploads. This reduces waiting time and improves transparency. However, online systems do not replace legal scrutiny. Buyers must still verify document accuracy, jurisdiction and compliance before submission. Digital convenience does not cure legal defects. Importance of Jurisdiction in Registration Documents must be registered at the Sub Registrar office having jurisdiction over the property location. Registering at the wrong office may invalidate the process. Buyers should confirm jurisdiction before booking appointments. Errors at this stage often cause delays and require fresh execution. Jurisdictional compliance is mandatory. Common Legal Issues During Property Registration Errors in names, property descriptions or consideration amounts are common. Such errors create discrepancies in public records and may require rectification deeds. Failure to include all co-owners or obtain necessary consents leads to incomplete transfers. Disputes often arise when family members or society approvals are overlooked. Attention to detail prevents long-term complications. Role of Housing Societies in Registration For properties in cooperative housing societies, society clearance or transfer forms may be required after registration. Society procedures do not replace statutory registration but affect administrative recognition. Buyers should coordinate with society management to update records post-registration. Clear communication avoids post-transfer disputes. Impact of Registration on Home Loans and Financing Banks require registered documents before disbursing loan amounts. Unregistered agreements delay financing and may affect eligibility. Registration also ensures lenders can create enforceable security interests. Buyers relying on loans should prioritise timely registration. Financial planning must align with legal timelines. Registration in Redevelopment and Under-Construction Projects In under-construction projects, buyers typically register an agreement for sale. The final sale deed is executed after completion. In redevelopment projects, registration confirms allotment rights and future ownership. Buyers should ensure agreements reflect approved plans and timelines. Legal clarity at this stage prevents disputes later. When Legal Advice Becomes Essential High value transactions, inherited properties, redevelopment flats and joint ownership arrangements involve higher legal risk. Professional review helps identify hidden issues. Many buyers engage the best property lawyers in Mumbai, India to review documents, verify compliance and oversee registration to avoid costly mistakes. Early legal support strengthens ownership security. Registration and Corporate or Commercial Property Purchases Commercial property transactions often involve additional compliance such as zoning, taxation and corporate approvals. Registration documents must align with business objectives and regulatory requirements. Companies frequently seek advice from the best corporate lawyers in Mumbai, India to structure transactions, manage risk and ensure enforceability. Commercial registration errors can have significant financial consequences. Conclusion Mumbai property registration is not a procedural formality but a critical legal step that secures ownership rights. Buyers who understand legal requirements, comply with stamp duty laws and verify documentation protect themselves from disputes and financial loss. In Mumbai’s complex real estate environment, informed registration practices provide certainty, enforceability and long-term security. Careful planning and professional guidance ensure that property ownership begins on a strong legal foundation.   FAQs on Mumbai Property Registration Q1. Is property registration mandatory in Mumbai? Yes. Registration is mandatory for documents creating ownership rights. Q2. Can an unregistered agreement be enforced? Unregistered documents have limited enforceability and evidentiary value. Q3. How long does property registration take? The process is usually completed on the same day once documents are ready. Q4. Is online registration legally valid? Yes, provided statutory requirements are met and documents are registered at the correct office. Q5. Can registration be cancelled? Registered documents can be cancelled only through court orders or fresh registered deeds.
verify occupation certificate in Mumbai,
How to Verify Occupation Certificate in Mumbai Online?
Buyers can verify occupation certificates through the official Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation portal. Approved documents and property records are available for public inspection. Verification involves checking property details, building number, approval dates and scope of OC. Buyers should ensure the certificate matches the specific building and flat number. Any discrepancy should be clarified before taking possession or completing payment. Verifying OC Through Physical Records In older buildings or redevelopment projects, digital records may be incomplete. Buyers can verify OC through physical records maintained by the municipal ward office. Certified copies can be requested through formal application. Society records also often contain copies of the OC. Independent verification avoids reliance on developer representations. Legal Risks of Occupying Property Without OC Occupation without OC exposes buyers to enforcement action by municipal authorities. This may include penalties, eviction notices or service disconnections. Properties without OC face difficulties during resale, mortgage and redevelopment. Insurance claims may also be affected in case of damage or accidents. Courts have consistently upheld the importance of OC in property disputes. Impact of OC on Home Loans and Resale Most financial institutions require OC before approving home loans or disbursing final instalments. Absence of OC may restrict financing options. Resale transactions also depend on OC availability. Buyers often refuse properties lacking OC due to legal uncertainty. A verified OC enhances marketability and value. Role of Housing Societies in OC Compliance In cooperative housing societies, managing committees play a role in ensuring OC compliance. Societies must maintain OC records and disclose status during transfers. Society consent does not override statutory requirements. Buyers should independently verify OC even if society records appear in order. Proper record keeping supports transparency. OC Issues in Redevelopment Projects Redevelopment projects often face delays in obtaining OC due to deviations or pending approvals. Existing occupants may be compelled to move in before OC issuance. Such occupation may be legally risky despite possession agreements. Redeveloped buildings without OC face challenges during future redevelopment or conveyance. Legal review of redevelopment agreements helps address OC related risks. When to Seek Legal Assistance OC disputes often arise when builders delay issuance or provide misleading information. Legal notices may be required to compel compliance. Buyers involved in commercial or mixed-use developments may consult a corporate law firm and lawyers in Mumbai to assess regulatory exposure and enforce contractual rights. Legal intervention at the right stage prevents prolonged disputes. Employment and Safety Compliance Considerations For commercial premises, OC verification affects workplace safety and employment compliance. Authorities may inspect OC status during labour or safety audits. Businesses operating from premises without OC risk closure or penalties. In such cases, advice from labour and employment lawyers in Mumbai helps manage regulatory exposure. OC compliance supports lawful business operations. Common Mistakes Buyers Should Avoid Many buyers assume possession letters or utility connections imply OC compliance. This assumption is incorrect. Another common error is failing to verify partial OC scope. Buyers must ensure coverage applies to their specific premises. Avoiding shortcuts protects long-term ownership rights. Conclusion To verify occupation certificate in Mumbai is a critical step for every property buyer and occupant. OC confirms regulatory compliance, safety and lawful occupation. Skipping verification exposes buyers to financial and legal risk. Whether purchasing a new flat, entering redevelopment or acquiring commercial premises, OC verification should never be overlooked. In Mumbai’s regulated real estate environment, due diligence and legal awareness remain the strongest safeguards for secure property ownership. FAQs on Occupation Certificate in Mumbai Q1. Is occupation certificate mandatory in Mumbai? Yes. OC is mandatory for lawful occupation of buildings. Q2. Can buyers occupy flats without OC? Occupation without OC is unauthorised and carries legal risk. Q3. How long does it take to obtain OC? Timelines vary based on compliance and inspections. Delays are common where deviations exist. Q4. Does OC expire? No. Once issued, OC remains valid unless revoked for violations. Q5. Can society apply for OC? Generally, the builder applies. Societies may apply in limited circumstances for older buildings.
legal issues in Mumbai real estate transactions
Top Legal Issues Faced in Mumbai Real Estate Transactions: How to Avoid Them
Mumbai’s real estate market remains one of the most active and valuable in India. High property prices, redevelopment projects and complex ownership histories often lead to legal issues in Mumbai real estate transactions. Buyers, sellers and investors frequently encounter disputes arising from title defects, regulatory non-compliance, unclear contracts and delayed possession. Many of these issues can be avoided with careful legal planning and informed decision making. This blog examines the most common legal issues faced in Mumbai real estate transactions and explains how parties can proactively avoid them through due diligence, documentation and regulatory compliance. Why Real Estate Transactions in Mumbai Are Legally Complex? Mumbai’s urban development includes old tenanted buildings, cooperative housing societies, redevelopment projects and mixed-use developments. Each category involves different legal frameworks and regulatory approvals. Multiple authorities such as municipal bodies, planning authorities and regulatory regulators play a role in property transactions. In addition, historical land records, redevelopment agreements and society bye laws add layers of complexity. Understanding these risks is the first step towards avoiding disputes. Legal Issues in Mumbai Real Estate Transactions Legal issues in Mumbai real estate transactions typically arise due to inadequate verification, unclear ownership structures and failure to comply with statutory requirements. These issues affect both residential and commercial properties. While some disputes are unavoidable, many stem from preventable errors during the transaction process. Early identification of legal risks significantly reduces exposure. Unclear or Defective Property Title Title disputes remain one of the most common legal problems in Mumbai. Properties may have incomplete ownership chains, unresolved inheritance claims or unregistered transfers. In redevelopment projects, title issues often arise due to pending conveyance from the developer to the housing society. Buyers who rely solely on possession without verifying title face serious risk. Comprehensive title due diligence before purchase is essential to confirm ownership and encumbrance status. Non-Compliance with Regulatory Approvals Properties constructed or altered without proper approvals frequently face legal challenges. Missing commencement certificates, deviations from sanctioned plans or lack of occupation certificates can lead to penalties or demolition notices. Buyers must verify approvals issued by local planning authorities before proceeding. Relying on marketing brochures instead of official documents often leads to disputes. Regulatory compliance ensures long-term legality and marketability of the property. RERA Related Disputes and Delays While the Real Estate Regulation Act has improved transparency, disputes still arise due to delayed possession, misleading disclosures or failure to meet declared timelines. Many buyers do not verify RERA registration or ongoing compliance before investing. RERA protection is effective only when buyers actively monitor disclosures and enforce rights. Understanding RERA obligations helps buyers avoid delayed or stalled projects. Ambiguous or One-Sided Agreements Sale agreements and development contracts often contain clauses favouring one party. Buyers frequently sign agreements without reviewing termination rights, delay compensation or escalation clauses. Ambiguous drafting creates room for interpretation disputes. Standard templates may not reflect project-specific risks. Careful review of contractual terms ensures balanced rights and enforceability. Disputes in Redevelopment Projects Redevelopment projects involve complex arrangements between developers, societies and existing occupants. Delays, altered plans and disputes over area allocation are common. Lack of clarity in development agreements and consent procedures often leads to prolonged litigation. Registered societies with clear documentation are better positioned to protect member interests during redevelopment. Issues with Cooperative Housing Societies Society related disputes include refusal of transfer approvals, disputed membership, unpaid dues and bye law violations. Buyers often overlook society compliance and pending disputes during purchase. These issues later affect resale, redevelopment or access to amenities. Reviewing society records and litigation history reduces post-purchase conflict. Stamp Duty and Registration Errors Incorrect stamp duty payment or delayed registration can invalidate transactions or attract penalties. Many parties underestimate stamp duty implications during family transfers or joint ownership changes. Unregistered documents have limited legal value. Registration formalises ownership and protects against future claims. Proper calculation and timely registration are non-negotiable. Encumbrances and Financial Liabilities Properties may be subject to mortgages, charges or unpaid dues. Failure to identify encumbrances exposes buyers to recovery actions by lenders or authorities. Encumbrance certificates and bank no-dues letters must be verified before transaction completion. Clear financial records ensure clean transfer. Tax Implications and Compliance Gaps Capital gains tax, goods and services tax in certain transactions and income tax compliance are often overlooked. Incorrect structuring may result in unexpected tax liabilities or penalties. Tax considerations should align with legal structuring decisions. Integrated legal and tax planning prevents surprises. How to Avoid These Legal Issues? Avoiding legal disputes requires a proactive approach. Independent due diligence, verification of approvals and careful contract review are essential. Buyers and investors often consult a top real estate law firm and lawyers in India to identify hidden risks, review documentation and ensure regulatory compliance. Legal support at the transaction stage is more cost-effective than dispute resolution later. Importance of Professional Legal Review Professional review adds objectivity and expertise. Lawyers assess title, compliance and contractual risk beyond surface-level checks. Complex commercial or high-value transactions benefit from advice tailored to business objectives. Engaging best corporate lawyers in Mumbai helps align legal compliance with commercial strategy. Early legal involvement strengthens transaction security. Monitoring Compliance After Transaction Legal risk does not end at registration. Buyers must ensure timely society membership, payment of dues and monitoring of redevelopment or regulatory changes. Ongoing vigilance prevents future disputes. Conclusion Legal issues in Mumbai real estate transactions are common due to the city’s complex property landscape. However, most disputes are preventable with informed planning, proper documentation and professional guidance. Buyers, sellers and investors who prioritise legal compliance reduce risk, protect capital and ensure long-term ownership security. In a market as dynamic as Mumbai, legal awareness is not optional but essential for successful real estate transactions. FAQs on Legal Issues in Mumbai Real Estate Transactions Q1. What is the most common legal issue in Mumbai property deals? Title defects and incomplete documentation are the most frequent issues. Q2. Does RERA registration guarantee timely possession? No. RERA provides remedies but cannot guarantee completion in all cases. Q3. Are society approvals legally binding? Society approvals are essential for administration but do not replace title verification. Q4. Is legal due diligence mandatory? It is not mandatory but strongly recommended to avoid disputes. Q5. Can legal issues delay resale of property? Yes. Unresolved disputes or non-compliance significantly affect resale.
Co-operative Housing Society Registration in Mumbai
How to Register a Co-operative Housing Society in Mumbai?
Co-operative Housing Society Registration in Mumbai is an essential legal process for residents who wish to manage their residential property collectively and transparently. With Mumbai’s dense urban landscape and growing apartment culture, registering a co-operative housing society provides legal recognition, structured governance, and long-term protection of residents’ rights. Many housing complexes operate informally for years, unaware of the legal and financial risks involved. Without registration, residents face difficulties in property management, redevelopment decisions, dispute resolution, and compliance with government authorities. This guide explains the complete registration process, legal framework, documentation, timelines, and common challenges involved in forming a co-operative housing society in Mumbai. Legal Framework Governing Housing Societies in Maharashtra Housing societies in Mumbai are governed by the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act 1960 and the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules. These laws regulate the formation, functioning, and management of Co-operative societies across the state. Registration is handled by the office of the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies under the Department of Co-operation, Government of Maharashtra. The official government portal of the Maharashtra Department of Co-operation provides updated circulars, forms, and procedural guidelines, which applicants should refer to during the registration process. Why Registration of a Co-operative Housing Society Is Important? Registration provides the society with a separate legal identity. This enables the society to own property, open bank accounts, enter into contracts, and initiate legal proceedings in its own name. Registered societies enjoy better control over maintenance collection, vendor management, redevelopment negotiations, and compliance with municipal authorities such as the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. Registration also ensures accountability among managing committee members and protects the collective interests of residents. Eligibility Conditions for Registering a Housing Society A minimum of ten individuals from different families is required to form a Co-operative housing society in Mumbai. These members must be eligible to enter into a contract and should reside in flats within the same building or housing complex. The building must be fit for habitation and ideally have an occupation certificate issued by the local authority. In redevelopment or builder promoted societies, additional conditions may apply depending on the project structure. Documents Required for Co-operative Housing Society Registration The documentation process plays a crucial role in registration approval. Applicants must submit proposed bye laws, application forms, and member declarations as prescribed under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules. Key documents include proof of ownership or allotment letters, identity and address proof of members, building completion documents, and a certificate from the architect confirming the building structure. The society must also submit a bank certificate confirming the opening of a provisional account in the proposed society name. All documents must be accurate and consistent, as discrepancies often lead to delays or rejection. Step by Step Process of Co-operative Housing Society Registration in Mumbai 1. Application Submission The registration process begins with submitting the application to the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies having jurisdiction over the property location. Applications are filed online or offline depending on current government procedures. The application must include all supporting documents along with the prescribed registration fee. Applicants should ensure compliance with the latest government circulars issued by the Registrar. 2. Scrutiny and Verification After submission, the Registrar scrutinises the application for legal compliance. This includes verification of member eligibility, building documents, and proposed bye laws. If deficiencies are identified, the Registrar issues a notice seeking clarification or additional documents. Timely responses are crucial to avoid rejection. 3. Registration Certificate Issuance Once satisfied, the Registrar grants approval and issues a Certificate of Registration. This certificate legally establishes the Co-operative housing society. The society is then required to adopt bye laws formally, appoint office bearers, and commence statutory compliance such as maintaining registers and filing annual returns. Time Frame for Registration The registration process generally takes two to three months, subject to document completeness and administrative workload. Delays often occur due to incorrect documentation or failure to respond to Registrar queries within stipulated timelines. Engaging professionals familiar with local procedures helps streamline the process and reduce delays. Common Challenges Faced During Registration One of the most common issues is incomplete documentation, especially missing building approvals or ownership proof. Disputes among members regarding management roles or contribution amounts can also stall the process. Builder related delays are another frequent obstacle, particularly when conveyance documents are pending. Legal guidance becomes important in such scenarios to protect residents’ interests and ensure compliance. Residents often consult the best property lawyers in Mumbai during complex registrations involving redevelopment, builder disputes, or title irregularities. Post Registration Compliance and Responsibilities After registration, the society must comply with statutory obligations such as maintaining books of accounts, conducting annual general meetings, and filing audit reports with the Registrar. The managing committee must operate transparently and in accordance with the approved bye laws. Non compliance can attract penalties or administrative action by the Registrar. Regular reference to government notifications issued by the Department of Co operation ensures ongoing compliance and avoids legal complications. Role of Professional Assistance in Society Registration While residents can undertake registration independently, professional assistance significantly reduces procedural errors. Legal experts help in drafting bye laws, verifying documents, and liaising with authorities. Complex housing projects involving mixed use properties or commercial units often require advice from the best corporate law firm and lawyers in Mumbai to ensure regulatory compliance and risk mitigation. Professional involvement also proves valuable in handling objections raised by the Registrar and expediting approvals. Redevelopment and Conveyance After Registration Registered societies gain legal standing to pursue conveyance of land and building from developers. This becomes crucial during redevelopment negotiations. Without registration, residents lack authority to enter redevelopment agreements or protect ownership rights. Timely registration therefore strengthens the society’s position in long term property planning. Conclusion Co-operative Housing Society Registration in Mumbai is not merely a procedural formality. It is a foundational step towards lawful property management, collective decision making, and protection of residents’ rights. Understanding the legal framework, documentation requirements, and registration process helps residents avoid unnecessary delays and disputes. With proper planning and professional support, registration can be completed smoothly and efficiently. A registered society ensures transparency, accountability, and long-term stability for housing communities in Mumbai.  Frequently Asked Questions Q1. What is the minimum number of members required to register a housing society in Mumbai? A minimum of ten members from different families is required for registration. Q2. Can a housing society be registered without an occupation certificate? Registration is possible in certain cases, but an occupation certificate is strongly recommended to avoid objections. Q3. How long does Co-operative Housing Society Registration in Mumbai take? The process usually takes two to three months, subject to document verification and administrative approvals. Q4. Is online registration available for housing societies in Mumbai? The Maharashtra government provides online facilities through the Department of Co operation portal, subject to prevailing rules. Q5. Can tenants become members of a housing society? Tenants cannot become members unless they hold ownership or allotment rights in the property. Q6. What happens if a society is not registered? Unregistered societies lack legal recognition, cannot own property, and face difficulties in banking, redevelopment, and dispute resolution.
MHCO Updates
Litigation Update
LITIGATION UPDATE I SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES LIMITATION LAW FOR POSSESSION SUITS BASED ON VOID SALE DEEDS
Contributors: Mr Akash Jain, Associate Partner Mr Divyang Salvi, Associate The Supreme Court of India in Shanti Devi v. Jagan Devi & Ors. (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1961) has clarified that when a property ownership dispute arises from a sale deed that is void ab initio, the lawful owner can file for possession within twelve years under Article 65 of the Limitation Act. The ruling distinguishes void from voidable documents, streamlining the remedy for owners whose property rights are threatened by fraudulent transfers and reinforcing robust legal protection for genuine titleholders. Facts in Brief: The case involved a longstanding dispute over agricultural land in Haryana (“Suit property”). The Plaintiffs asserted ownership of a one-third share in land, alleging that the Defendant’s possession was based on a fraudulent sale deed dated 1973, which the alleged seller (Plaintiff) had never executed. The Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction, or in the alternative, joint possession of the land, and a declaration that the sale deed was void after 11 years. The Trial Court dismissed their suit, but the first Appellate Court and the High Court ruled in their favour. The Defendant appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the suit was time-barred and that the Plaintiffs failed to prove fraud or lack of execution of the deed. Supreme Court Findings: The Supreme Court confined itself to the issue of whether the Plaintiff’s suit was time-barred. It held that the suit, though filed eleven years after the impugned sale deed, was governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act. The Court explained that suits for possession based on title are maintainable within twelve years when the impugned sale deed is void ab initio, and not merely voidable. The Court stressed that in such a case, the original owner’s right is not affected by a fraudulent or forged instrument, and there is no requirement to seek its cancellation within Article 59’s three-year window. The Court also highlighted the difference between fraud relating to the ‘character’ of a document (which renders it void) and as to its contents (which may make it voidable). Evidence clearly showed the Plaintiff never executed the deed or received consideration, confirming the judgment of the Lower Appellate Courts in the Plaintiff’s favour. Impact: This ruling clarifies the limitation law applicable in cases of fraudulent property transfers and offers practical assurance to property owners facing similar circumstances. The decision enables owners to challenge unlawful possession based on forged or fraudulent documents for up to twelve years after adverse possession begins, expanding access to remedy. By reinforcing the distinction between void and voidable transactions, the Court’s decision will streamline property litigation and strengthen legal certainty in title disputes. Stakeholders—in particular, landowners—must ensure careful record-keeping and timely action if their property rights are infringed by such transactions. MHCO Comment: The Supreme Court’s approach brings much-needed clarity to real estate litigation involving fraudulent sale deeds. By recognising the extended limitation window for actions based on void documents and minimising procedural hurdles, the ruling affirms substantive justice and legal security for legitimate landowners. The judgment will promote diligence, transparency, and fair outcomes in property disputes, contributing to overall real estate market stability in India.
Gaming Law Update
GAMING LAW UPDATE: PROMOTION AND REGULATION OF ONLINE GAMING ACT, 2025
Contributors: Mr Bhushan Shah, Partner, Ms Shreya Dalal, Associate Partner Mr Abhishek Nair, Associate On 22 August 2025, the Central Government enacted the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 (“Gaming Act”). The Bill was passed by Parliament with remarkable speed, within seven minutes in the Lok Sabha and twenty-six minutes in the Rajya Sabha, before receiving Presidential assent the following day. The Gaming Act provides for the promotion of e-sports and online social games, while prohibiting online money games involving stakes or wagers for monetary gain. It also establishes a regulatory authority to oversee the sector and sets out stringent penalties for violations. Recognition and Promotion of E-Sports and Social Games The Gaming Act empowers the Central Government to formally recognise e-sports as a legitimate competitive sport. It may issue guidelines, establish training academies, provide incentives, and coordinate with States to promote such activities. Online social games designed for entertainment or educational purposes and not involving monetary stakes are also to be facilitated through registration mechanisms, awareness initiatives, and institutional support programmes. Definitions under the Act The Act introduces the following key definitions: Online game: any game offered on a digital platform. E-sport: skill-based competitive events without wagering. Online social game: non-wagering, entertainment, or skill-development based online games. Online money game: any game involving fees, deposits, or stakes in expectation of monetary or equivalent returns, excluding e-sports. Recognition and Promotion of E-Sports and Social Games The Gaming Act empowers the Central Government to recognise e-sports as a legitimate competitive sport through guidelines, training academies, incentives, and coordination with States. Both e-sports and online social games are subject to registration with the designated Authority, which may impose technical and playerprotection standards. Online social games for entertainment or educational purposes without monetary stakes will be promoted through registration mechanisms, awareness initiatives, and institutional support. Prohibition of Online Money Games The Gaming Act imposes a complete prohibition on offering, operating, advertising, or participating in online money games, including those offered from foreign jurisdictions. Banks and financial institutions are also prohibited from facilitating related transactions. Penalties for violations: Up to three years’ imprisonment and fines up to ₹1 crore for offering online money games or facilitating funds for online money games. Up to two years’ imprisonment and fines up to ₹50 lakh for advertising online money games. Enhanced punishments for repeat offences. Non-compliance with directions may lead to penalties up to ₹10 lakh, suspension, or cancellation of registration. Offences under the prohibition of online money games are cognizable and non-bailable, and company officers may also be held liable. The Act further empowers investigation, search, and seizure (including of digital resources), and blocking of non-compliant services. Authority and Regulatory Oversight The Central Government may establish or designate an Authority to classify games, register permissible ones, address complaints, and issue directions. MHCO Comment The Gaming Act provides a comprehensive framework for the regulation of online gaming in India. It balances the encouragement of e-sports and social games with stringent restrictions on money-based gaming. However, the Gaming Act has already had a disruptive impact on the industry as leading platforms such as WinZO, Dream11, MPL, and PokerBaazi have already suspended their real-money offerings immediately following the enactment of the said Act, in a sector employing over 20 million people. By effectively shutting down the largest revenue-generating segment of the online gaming industry, the Gaming Act is eroding the growth in the sector. We believe that the Central Government ought to have issued market policy consultation papers and taken public comments before drastically resorting to passing the Gaming Act in such a hasty manner.  
LITIGATION UPDATE
LITIGATION UPDATE: INDIVIDUALS LIABILITY IN CASE OF ONE PERSON COMPANY
Contributors:  Mr. Bhushan Shah, Partner Mr. Aakash Mehta, Senior Associate On 3 July 2025, the High Court of Bombay passed an Order setting aside directions passed by Arbitral Tribunal imposing personal liability on sole shareholder of One Person Company (OPC). FACTS Innovative Film Academy Private Limited (“Innovative”), is a One Person Company (“OPC”) incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 2013 formed by Mr. Saravana Prasad as its sole shareholder. Innovative entered into a Production Agreement dated 10 March 2021 (“Agreement”) with Endemol India Private Limited (“Endemol”) to produce episodes of the television show “Masterchef” in Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam. Endemol delivered the Tamil and Telugu episodes and raised invoices totaling approximately ₹15.93 crores, of which ₹4.45 crores was paid and ₹1.08 crores was adjusted against other dues, leaving an outstanding balance of approximately ₹10.40 crores. Disputes over these dues which lead to arbitral proceedings in turn resulting in the impugned interim order. The Arbitral Tribunal directed both Innovative and Prasad to: deposit ₹10.40 crores in a fixed deposit in a nationalized bank; disclose all assets (movable and immovable) and all encumbrances, charges and attachment on such assets since March 2019; disclose details of all companies and firms in which they are shareholders, directors or partners and the extent of their interest in such enterprises; disclose all income-tax returns since March 2019 along with the profit and loss account and all ledger statements along with narrations; and disclose details of all bank accounts held by them since March 2019. Innovative and Prasad challenged these directions, arguing that imposing personal obligations on Prasad violated the limited liability framework of OPC under the Companies Act, 2013. ISSUE Does the limited liability of an OPC mean that the sole shareholder is not personally liable? JUDGMENT The High Court held that the order passed by Arbitral Tribunal erred in treating Innovative and Prasad as one entity, disregarding the legal distinction between an OPC and its sole shareholder. The Court pointed out that under Section 2(62) of the Companies Act, 2013, an OPC is a distinct juridical entity with limited liability, shielding the sole shareholder (Prasad) from personal liability for the company’s obligations. The Court further emphasized that the concept of OPC is inspired by global practices (e.g., in the EU, USA, UK, China, and Singapore), and was designed to ring-fence personal assets from business liabilities. The Arbitral Tribunal’s directions against Prasad, including the deposit and disclosures, conflicted with this fundamental policy of Indian law. The Court further opined that that Prasad’s actions as the signatory to contracts or correspondence would not make him personally liable and such a view would undermine the statutory OPC framework. The Court further held the Arbitral Tribunal’s direction for Innovative to deposit monies in a fixed deposit is a balanced approach which protects Endemol’s interests without depriving Innovative of control over the funds. The Bombay High Court partially allowed the appeals with ruling that the directions imposing obligations on Saravana Prasad for the deposit and disclosures were set aside as they violated the limited liability protections of OPC under the Companies Act, 2013. The Bombay High Court further held that the directions against Innovative, including the fixed deposit and disclosures of its assets, liabilities, and interests, were upheld as just and equitable interim measures. The Court also clarified that its observations were not intended to influence the final arbitration outcome. MHCO COMMENT In our opinion, this judgment strengthens the legal framework laid out in the Companies Act, 2013 for One Person Companies in India, affirming that sole shareholders cannot be held personally liable for company obligations unless there are specific contractual or factual grounds that justify the same. The order provides clarity for entrepreneurs using the OPC structure, ensuring their personal assets remain protected. The decision also underscores the judiciary’s restraint in interfering with arbitral orders unless they are violative of fundamental legal principles.
Real Estate Update
REAL ESTATE UPDATE: MAINTENANCE LEVY IN CONDOMINIUMS
Authors: Purvi Asher, Partner and Karishma Maheshwari, Associate This case concerns a recent decision dated 4 August 2025 by the Bombay High Court in the case of Sachin Malpani and Ors. vs. Nilam Patil and Ors. The writ petition questioned the method of levying maintenance charges in a registered condominium under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 (“the Act”), and challenged the jurisdiction of the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies in directing such charges to be apportioned based on undivided share. Brief Facts The petition stemmed from a dispute in the ‘Treasure Park’ condominium comprising 356 apartments. The petitioners, owning larger apartments (3BHK, 4BHK), objected to an order by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Pune, dated 8 July 2021, which directed that maintenance charges be levied proportionate to the undivided share of each owner, instead of the previously prevailing equal charge. The challenge was rejected by the Co-operative Court on 13 May 2022, prompting the present writ petition. Issues for Adjudication The core issues for adjudication were:   Whether the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies had jurisdiction under the Act to pass such orders. What is the correct method of levying maintenance charges- equal across apartments or proportionate to undivided share in common areas, as prescribed by law and the condominium’s Deed of Declaration. Held The Bombay High Court held that: Notifications issued by the State Government validly conferred powers of the Registrar under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 onto the District Deputy Registrar, thus justifying the order's jurisdiction. The Deed of Declaration provisions and Sections 6 and 10 of the Act require that both common profits and common expenses be distributed among apartment owners in proportion to their undivided interest. The impugned resolutions and past practice of equal maintenance do not override statutory requirements; apartment owners with a higher undivided share must contribute proportionally to common expenses. Relief The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding both the Deputy Registrar’s order dated 8 July 2021, and the Co-operative Court’s order dated 13 May 2022. The petitioners’ challenge was rejected, confirming the requirement of proportionate maintenance charges. MHCO Comment This judgment clarifies the application of the Act in the context of maintenance contribution in registered condominiums, emphasizing statutory compliance over majority resolutions. It confirms that statutory covenants in the Deed of Declaration and the Act must govern apportionment of expenses, ensuring fairness in financial obligations shared among owners according to their interest, preventing disproportionate burdens on smaller flat owners and aligning practice with the law.
LIFE AT MHCO
Need Help? Chat with us