CELEBRATING MORE THAN YEARS
AWARDS & RECOGNITION
PRACTICE AREAS
Dispute Resolution
Insolvency & Restructuring
General Corporate & Corporate Advisory
Real Estate & Property Laws
Employment & Labour Law
Regulatory Practice
Family Constitution, Succession, Estate Planning, Trust & Private Clients
Intellectual Property Rights
Mergers / Amalgamations / Business Transfer
Foreign Investments
Tax
Banking & Finance
Cyber Law, Privacy, Data Protection & Information Technology
Startups
PEOPLE

RA ShahManaging Partner

Niranjan parekhSenior Partner

Bhushan ShahPartner

Purvi AsherPartner

Shreya DalalAssociate Partner

Meeta kadhiAssociate Partner

Akash JainAssociate Partner

Sanjana SaddyOf-Counsel

Bhavin shahOf-Counsel
News and Articles
Checklist for Opening a Company
Legal Checklist for Opening a Company in India
Opening a Company in India requires careful legal planning, regulatory compliance and structured documentation. Entrepreneurs often focus on business strategy and funding, yet overlook statutory requirements that govern incorporation and post registration obligations. A structured legal checklist ensures smooth registration, regulatory approval and long-term compliance. Whether you are a domestic founder or foreign investor, opening a Company in India involves adherence to corporate law, tax law and sector specific regulations.
This guide provides a comprehensive legal checklist for company incorporation in India, including entity selection, documentation, statutory filings and compliance obligations.
Choosing the Appropriate Business Structure
The first legal decision involves selecting the correct entity structure. Common forms include private limited company, limited liability partnership, one person company and public limited company. A private limited company is the most preferred structure for startups and growing businesses. It provides limited liability protection, separate legal identity and easier fundraising opportunities. Entity selection impacts taxation, compliance burden and governance framework. Legal evaluation at this stage prevents restructuring challenges later.
Opening a Company in India Under the Companies Act
Opening a Company in India is governed primarily by the Companies Act and administered by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Incorporation requires approval of company name, filing of constitutional documents and registration through the Registrar of Companies. The official portal of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs facilitates online filing and digital verification. Directors must obtain Digital Signature Certificates and Director Identification Numbers before incorporation. The Memorandum of Association defines the company’s objectives. The Articles of Association govern internal management and shareholder rights. Proper drafting of these documents is essential to prevent governance disputes.
Name Reservation and Compliance
Name approval is an important step. The proposed name must not be identical or misleadingly similar to an existing entity. The Registrar evaluates name availability and compliance with naming guidelines. Rejection at this stage delays incorporation. Careful selection aligned with regulatory norms ensures smooth approval.
Digital Signature and Director Identification
Every proposed director must obtain a Digital Signature Certificate. This enables electronic filing of incorporation documents. Directors must also apply for Director Identification Number through statutory forms. Failure to comply with identification requirements may invalidate incorporation documents. Accurate personal documentation avoids delays.
Drafting Constitutional Documents
The Memorandum of Association outlines business objects and authorised share capital. The Articles of Association define internal governance, voting rights and director powers. Clear drafting protects shareholder interests and reduces future litigation risk. In venture backed companies, shareholder agreements may supplement Articles to regulate investor rights. Precision at drafting stage supports long term stability.
Registered Office and Statutory Filings
Every company must declare a registered office address in India. This address is used for official communication and statutory notices. Proof of address, utility bills and consent of premises owner are required during incorporation. Incorrect address documentation may lead to compliance penalties.
Share Capital and Subscription
Subscribers to the Memorandum must specify share capital contribution. Capital structure should align with business plan and investment strategy. Inadequate planning of shareholding ratios often leads to control disputes. Clear documentation of capital structure is fundamental.
Tax Registrations and PAN
After incorporation, the company must obtain Permanent Account Number and Tax Deduction Account Number. These are necessary for tax compliance and banking operations. Goods and services tax registration may be required depending on turnover and business nature. Early tax registration avoids operational delays.
Bank Account Opening and Capital Infusion
A corporate bank account must be opened in the company’s name. Share capital must be deposited within statutory timelines. Banking compliance ensures transparency and financial discipline. Failure to deposit capital may attract regulatory scrutiny.
Sector Specific Licences and Approvals
Certain industries require additional approvals such as foreign investment clearance, sectoral licences or environmental approvals. Regulatory research must precede commencement of operations. Operating without required approvals may attract penalties or closure.
Labour Law and Employment Compliance
Companies hiring employees must comply with labour regulations. Registration under employee provident fund and employee state insurance schemes may apply depending on employee strength. Employment contracts should clearly define roles, confidentiality obligations and termination clauses. Labour compliance reduces operational risk and litigation exposure.
Ongoing Compliance Obligations
Opening a Company in India is only the beginning. Companies must conduct board meetings, maintain statutory registers and file annual returns with the Registrar. Non-compliance may result in fines or director disqualification. Structured compliance calendar ensures timely filings.
Importance of Professional Legal Support
Entrepreneurs often attempt incorporation independently without understanding legal implications. Errors in drafting or compliance can lead to costly rectifications. Many founders seek professional assistance to setup a company in India efficiently and in full compliance with statutory requirements. Legal review strengthens governance framework and investor confidence.
Private Limited Company Registration Considerations
When founders plan to register Pvt ltd company in India, they must consider minimum director requirements, shareholding pattern and compliance obligations under corporate law. Private limited structure offers flexibility in ownership but imposes statutory reporting duties. Careful planning at registration stage reduces restructuring cost in future funding rounds.
Common Mistakes in Company Incorporation
One common mistake is selecting a generic object clause without considering long term expansion. Another is neglecting shareholder agreements at early stage. Improper share allocation often causes founder disputes. Inadequate compliance tracking leads to penalties. Awareness and planning prevent avoidable complications.
Conclusion
Opening a Company in India involves more than filing incorporation forms. It requires strategic planning, legal compliance and structured governance from the outset. Entrepreneurs who follow a detailed legal checklist reduce risk, attract investor confidence and build sustainable enterprises. From entity selection to ongoing compliance, each step plays a critical role in long term success. With proper documentation, regulatory awareness and professional guidance, company incorporation in India can be completed smoothly and efficiently.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1. How long does company incorporation take in India?
Incorporation usually takes several working days subject to document accuracy and regulatory approval.
Q2. Is physical presence required for directors?
Directors may complete many procedures digitally, subject to identity verification norms.
Q3. Can foreign nationals open a company in India?
Yes. Foreign nationals may incorporate subject to foreign investment regulations.
Q4. Is minimum capital required for private limited company?
There is no statutory minimum capital requirement, though practical funding needs must be considered.
Q5. What happens if annual compliance is not completed?
Failure to comply may result in penalties and director disqualification.
Commercial Leasing in Mumbai
A Legal Guide to Commercial Leasing in Mumbai: Negotiation, Documentation and Risk Management
Commercial real estate transactions in Mumbai involve significant financial commitments and long-term business implications. Commercial Leasing in Mumbai requires careful negotiation, precise documentation and strategic risk management to protect both landlords and corporate tenants. Unlike residential arrangements, commercial leases involve complex clauses on tenure, escalation, fit out obligations, regulatory approvals and dispute resolution.
This guide explains the legal framework governing commercial leasing in Mumbai, key negotiation points, documentation requirements and practical risk management strategies for businesses and property owners.
Legal Framework Governing Commercial Leases
Commercial leases in Mumbai are primarily governed by the Transfer of Property Act, the Registration Act and the Maharashtra Stamp Act. These laws regulate creation of leasehold interest, stamp duty payment and registration requirements.
In certain cases, municipal regulations and zoning laws also apply, especially where premises are used for specific commercial activities. Companies must ensure use of property aligns with development control regulations. Registration of commercial lease agreements exceeding the statutory duration is mandatory for enforceability.
Commercial Leasing in Mumbai and Core Legal Principles
Commercial Leasing in Mumbai creates a legally enforceable interest in property. A lease grants exclusive possession for a specified term in exchange for rent or consideration. The lease document defines rights and obligations of both parties. It governs rent structure, lock in period, renewal rights, maintenance charges and termination clauses.
Unlike leave and licence, a commercial lease generally grants stronger possession rights to the tenant. This distinction has implications for eviction and dispute resolution. Clarity in drafting is essential to prevent future litigation.
Negotiation of Key Commercial Terms
Negotiation is the foundation of any successful commercial lease. Landlords seek long term stability and predictable rental income. Tenants focus on flexibility, business continuity and cost control. Critical negotiation areas include rent escalation formula, security deposit quantum, fit out period, grace period before rent commencement and termination rights. A well negotiated lease balances commercial expectations with legal certainty. Ambiguity during negotiation often leads to disputes later.
Lock In Period and Exit Clauses
Lock in period clauses are common in commercial leases. They restrict termination for a specified duration and ensure stability for both parties. Exit clauses must define notice period, penalty consequences and refund of deposit clearly. Failure to draft precise exit provisions creates financial exposure. Businesses planning expansion or restructuring should negotiate exit flexibility carefully.
Stamp Duty and Registration Requirements
Stamp duty on commercial leases in Maharashtra is calculated based on rent, deposit and tenure. Underpayment attracts penalties and affects enforceability. Registration is mandatory for leases exceeding prescribed duration. Unregistered leases have limited evidentiary value in court. Timely stamping and registration protect contractual rights.
Due Diligence Before Executing Lease
Corporate tenants must conduct property due diligence before signing. Verification includes title check, encumbrance review, zoning compliance and municipal approvals. Leasing property without proper permissions may expose the tenant to regulatory action. Many businesses consult best property lawyers in Mumbai, India to conduct due diligence and review lease terms before execution. Early legal review reduces long term operational risk.
Fit Out and Alteration Rights
Commercial tenants often require interior modifications to suit operational needs. Lease agreements must clearly specify responsibility for approvals, restoration obligations and structural restrictions. Failure to define fit out responsibilities may result in dispute at lease expiry. Clear drafting protects both landlord’s property rights and tenant’s operational flexibility.
Maintenance, CAM Charges and Utilities
Commercial leases typically include common area maintenance charges and utility responsibilities. These must be transparent and proportionately allocated. Ambiguous maintenance clauses often cause disagreement between parties. Precise financial provisions prevent disputes and facilitate budgeting.
Risk Allocation and Indemnity Clauses
Risk allocation clauses address damage, insurance, third party claims and compliance obligations. Tenants usually bear operational risk while landlords retain structural responsibility. Indemnity clauses should be balanced and proportionate. Excessive indemnity exposure can create unforeseen liability. Professional drafting ensures fairness and enforceability.
Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Commercial leases frequently include arbitration clauses to manage disputes efficiently. Arbitration provides confidentiality and faster resolution compared to court litigation. Jurisdiction and governing law clauses must be consistent with local laws. Businesses may engage corporate lawyers in Mumbai, India to structure dispute resolution clauses aligned with commercial strategy. Strategic dispute planning reduces uncertainty.
Termination and Possession Recovery
Termination rights must clearly define default events, notice procedure and remedy periods. Ambiguous termination clauses often lead to litigation. On lease expiry, possession handover terms should be clearly recorded, including restoration and refund of deposit. Clear end of term provisions ensures smooth exit.
Taxation and Financial Implications
Commercial leasing may attract goods and services tax depending on nature of transaction. Corporate tenants must assess input tax credit eligibility. Long term leases may also affect accounting treatment under corporate financial reporting standards. Integrated legal and financial review prevents compliance gaps.
Regulatory Compliance for Business Operations
Certain commercial activities require trade licences or municipal approvals. Tenants must ensure premises meet statutory standards before commencing operations. Non-compliance may lead to closure notices or penalties. Regulatory review should be part of pre leases due diligence.
Common Mistakes in Commercial Leasing
One common mistake is relying on standard template agreements without customisation. Each commercial lease requires tailoring to business objectives. Another frequent issue is ignoring renewal clauses or escalation formulas during negotiation. Insufficient legal review often results in costly disputes. Attention to detail safeguards commercial interests.
Conclusion
Commercial Leasing in Mumbai demands careful legal planning and informed negotiation. The financial stakes are high and documentation must reflect commercial realities and regulatory compliance. Landlords seek stability while tenants require operational flexibility. Balanced lease drafting protects both interests and reduces risk. In Mumbai’s competitive commercial property market, structured negotiation, precise documentation and proactive risk management remain the pillars of successful commercial leasing arrangements.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1. What is the typical tenure of commercial leases in Mumbai?
Tenure varies but commonly ranges from three to nine years depending on negotiation.
Q2. Is registration mandatory for commercial lease agreements?
Yes, registration is required for leases exceeding statutory duration.
Q3. Can a tenant terminate during lock in period?
Termination during lock in may attract penalties unless contract permits otherwise.
Q4. Who pays stamp duty in commercial leasing?
Stamp duty liability is usually shared or negotiated between parties.
Q5. Is arbitration common in commercial lease disputes?
Yes, arbitration clauses are commonly included to manage disputes efficiently.
Lease vs Leave and Licence in Mumbai
Lease vs. Leave & Licence in Mumbai: Key Legal Differences and Best Practices
Understanding the distinction between lease and leave and licence arrangements is essential for property owners and occupants in Mumbai. The legal structure chosen affects possession rights, eviction procedures, taxation and long-term control over property. The debate around Lease vs Leave and Licence in Mumbai continues to create confusion among landlords and tenants who assume both arrangements function in the same manner. In reality, they are governed by different legal principles and carry distinct legal consequences.
This guide explains the legal differences between lease and leaves and licence in Mumbai, statutory framework, enforceability, taxation, eviction process and practical best practices for both landlords and occupants.
Legal Framework Governing Lease and Leave and Licence
A lease is governed primarily by the Transfer of Property Act. It creates an interest in the property and grants exclusive possession to the lessee for a defined period in exchange for rent. A leave and licence agreement is governed by the Indian Easements Act and local tenancy regulations. It grants permission to occupy premises without creating an interest in the property.
In Maharashtra, leave and licence agreements must be registered when exceeding the statutory duration. Registration ensures enforceability and compliance with state laws. The distinction lies in whether an interest in property is transferred or mere permission is granted.
Lease vs Leave and Licence in Mumbai Explained
Lease vs Leave and Licence in Mumbai is not merely a terminological difference. It determines the legal rights of the occupant and the remedies available to the owner. A lease grants exclusive possession and creates a transferable interest. The lessee may have stronger protection against eviction.
A leave and licence arrangement grants only a personal right to use premises. The licensor retains control and can recover possession more easily upon expiry. Courts examine the substance of the agreement rather than its title.
Exclusive Possession and Legal Interest
The core test in distinguishing lease from licence is exclusive possession. If the occupant has full control and possession for a defined period, the arrangement may be considered a lease. If the owner retains significant control and grants only permission to use the premises, it is treated as licence. The nature of possession directly impacts eviction rights and dispute resolution. Clarity in drafting is critical.
Duration and Termination Rights
Lease agreements often span longer durations and may include renewal clauses. Termination usually requires notice as per contract terms or statutory requirements. Leave and licence agreements in Mumbai are commonly executed for eleven months. This structure avoids certain tenancy protections and simplifies renewal. Termination of licence is generally easier once the agreed term expires. Owners must evaluate their long-term objectives before selecting structure.
Registration and Stamp Duty Implications
Both lease and leave and licence agreements require proper stamping and registration when exceeding prescribed duration. Stamp duty rates differ based on agreement type and tenure. Incorrect payment may attract penalties and affect enforceability. Registration ensures documentary validity and prevents future disputes. Failure to register may limit evidentiary value.
Eviction and Dispute Resolution
Eviction procedures vary significantly between lease and leave and licence. Under lease arrangements, eviction may require civil litigation, especially where tenant protection laws apply. Under leave and licence, recovery of possession can be comparatively faster, subject to statutory compliance. Many landlords prefer leave and licence due to simplified possession recovery. In complex disputes involving possession rights, parties often consult trusted real estate lawyers in Mumbai, India to assess legal remedies and procedural strategy.
Tax and Financial Considerations
Rental income from lease and licence is generally taxed similarly under income tax law. However, commercial leasing may involve goods and services tax implications depending on usage. Long term leases may also impact capital gains computation if structured improperly. Legal and tax review before execution prevents unintended liabilities.
Commercial Property and Corporate Considerations
Commercial premises frequently involve lease structures due to longer operational needs. Corporations prefer leases for stability and security of tenure. Corporate due diligence examines termination clauses, lock in periods and escalation provisions carefully. Companies often seek advice from top corporate lawyers in Mumbai, India to ensure lease documentation aligns with business objectives and compliance standards. Commercial disputes can carry significant financial exposure.
Practical Best Practices for Landlords
Landlords should define objectives clearly before choosing between lease and leave and licence. If flexibility and ease of eviction are priorities, licence arrangements may be suitable. All agreements must clearly specify duration, rent, deposit, termination terms and dispute resolution mechanism. Regular documentation updates reduce ambiguity. Proper registration is essential.
Practical Best Practices for Tenants and Licensees
Occupants must review agreement terms carefully. Lease offers stronger possessory rights, whereas licence provides limited security. Tenants should ensure clauses regarding maintenance, rent escalation and early termination are clearly drafted. Understanding the difference protects long term occupancy rights. Professional review prevents avoidable disputes.
Common Mistakes in Drafting Agreements
One frequent error is labelling a document as licence while granting exclusive possession. Courts may interpret such arrangement as lease based on substance. Another common mistake is failing to register agreements exceeding statutory limits. Ambiguous termination clauses often lead to litigation. Precision in drafting is critical.
Judicial Interpretation in Mumbai
Courts in Mumbai consistently apply the test of intention and possession to distinguish lease from licence. Even if titled licence, agreements conferring exclusive control may be treated as lease. This interpretation reinforces the importance of careful drafting and alignment with legal objectives. Substance prevails over terminology.
Conclusion
Lease vs Leave and Licence in Mumbai is a fundamental legal distinction affecting possession, control and dispute resolution. While both structures are legally valid, the choice must align with long term objectives, risk appetite and operational needs. Landlords seeking flexibility often prefer leave and licence. Tenants requiring security may prefer lease. Proper documentation, registration and legal review ensure clarity and enforceability. In Mumbai’s dynamic property market, informed decision making and structured agreements remain the foundation of secure and dispute free property arrangements.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1. What is the main difference between lease and leave and licence in Mumbai?
A lease creates an interest in property while licence grants permission without transferring ownership interest.
Q2. Is leave and licence safer for landlords?
It often provides easier termination rights compared to lease, subject to proper drafting.
Q3. Does registration apply to both agreements?
Yes. Registration is required when duration exceeds statutory threshold.
Q4. Can a licence become a lease legally?
Yes. Courts may interpret licence as lease if exclusive possession is granted.
Q5. Which is better for commercial property?
Commercial properties commonly use leases due to long term operational requirements.
Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act (MAOA)
Understanding Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act (MAOA): A Practical Guide for Owners
Apartment ownership in Maharashtra is governed by a distinct legal framework separate from cooperative housing societies. The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act MAOA provides a statutory structure for ownership of individual apartments and shared common areas within a building. Many flat purchasers are unaware of how this Act operates and how it differs from society-based ownership. Understanding the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act MAOA is essential for protecting ownership rights, managing common areas and resolving disputes in apartment buildings.
This guide explains the legal structure, rights and obligations of apartment owners, formation of associations, conveyance, common area management and practical challenges under MAOA.
Legal Background of Apartment Ownership in Maharashtra
The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act was enacted to provide a clear legal mechanism for individual ownership of apartments along with proportionate rights in common areas. Unlike cooperative societies, where ownership is structured through shareholding, MAOA recognises direct ownership of an apartment as heritable and transferable property. The Act operates alongside other property laws such as the Transfer of Property Act and Registration laws. It also interacts with the Real Estate Regulation framework for new projects. Apartment ownership under MAOA is document driven and requires proper declaration by the promoter.
Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act MAOA and Its Core Structure
The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act MAOA establishes a system where each apartment owner holds exclusive ownership of their unit along with an undivided interest in common areas. This interest is inseparable from the apartment and passes automatically upon transfer.
The Act requires the promoter to execute and register a Declaration submitting the property to MAOA. This Declaration defines the building description, apartment numbers, common areas, percentage of undivided interest and bye laws governing management. Without a properly registered Declaration, the building cannot operate fully under MAOA.
Declaration and Deed of Apartment
A Declaration is the foundational document under MAOA. It must be registered and include complete details of land, building structure, common facilities and proportionate interests.
Each purchaser then receives a Deed of Apartment which confirms ownership of the specific unit and proportionate share in common areas. The Deed of Apartment is a title document and must be registered to establish legal ownership. Incomplete or defective Declarations often lead to disputes.
Difference Between MAOA and Cooperative Housing Society Model
Under cooperative housing laws, members own shares in a society which in turn owns the property. Under MAOA, owners hold direct title to their apartments.
This distinction affects transfer procedure, mortgage creation and inheritance. Apartment owners under MAOA do not require society share transfer but must comply with association bye laws. The governance model differs significantly between the two systems. Buyers must verify which legal structure applies to their building.
Formation of Association of Apartment Owners
MAOA requires formation of an Association of Apartment Owners. This association manages common areas, maintenance charges and building administration. The association functions under bye laws annexed to the Declaration. It is not identical to a cooperative society but performs similar administrative roles. Transparent governance and proper record keeping are essential to avoid conflict among owners.
Rights of Apartment Owners Under MAOA
Apartment owners enjoy exclusive possession of their unit along with undivided interest in common areas such as staircases, lifts, parking and open spaces. Owners have the right to use common facilities subject to compliance with bye laws. They also participate in association decisions and vote on maintenance and administrative matters. Ownership rights are transferable and heritable, subject to registration formalities.
Responsibilities and Maintenance Obligations
Apartment owners must contribute proportionately to common expenses. Maintenance charges are calculated based on percentage interest defined in the Declaration. Failure to pay dues may result in recovery action by the association. Owners must also comply with building rules and refrain from structural alterations affecting safety or common areas. Clear documentation reduces conflict.
Conveyance and Land Ownership Under MAOA
One common issue arises where promoters fail to convey land to the association. Proper conveyance ensures collective ownership of land and structure. Delay in conveyance weakens owner rights during redevelopment or litigation. Owners often seek assistance from top real estate lawyers in Mumbai, India to secure conveyance and regularise ownership documentation in complex cases. Legal intervention ensures compliance with statutory obligations.
Redevelopment Under MAOA Framework
Redevelopment of buildings governed by MAOA requires consent procedures and compliance with property laws. Since ownership is direct rather than share based, consent thresholds differ from cooperative society norms. Clear title and proper Declaration simplify redevelopment negotiations. Ambiguity in common area definition often causes disputes during redevelopment. Careful review of governing documents is critical.
Common Legal Disputes Under MAOA
Disputes typically arise over maintenance allocation, parking rights, alteration of common areas or improper management by the association. In some cases, promoters register incomplete Declarations leading to confusion regarding ownership percentages. Such disputes may escalate to civil courts. Owners facing complex conflicts often consult best dispute resolution lawyers in Mumbai, India to enforce statutory rights or challenge irregular decisions. Early resolution prevents prolonged litigation.
Interaction with RERA and Other Laws
For new projects, the promoter must comply with real estate regulatory requirements alongside MAOA. RERA disclosures should align with Declaration details. Discrepancies between RERA registration and MAOA documentation can create legal exposure. Owners must ensure documentation consistency across statutory frameworks. Integrated compliance strengthens ownership security.
Transfer and Sale of Apartment Under MAOA
Transfer of an apartment requires execution and registration of a sale deed referencing the Deed of Apartment. The undivided interest automatically transfers with the apartment. Unlike cooperative societies, there is no requirement of share certificate endorsement. However, association records must be updated. Proper stamp duty payment and registration remain mandatory.
Importance of Legal Review Before Purchase
Buyers should verify whether the building is governed by MAOA and review the registered Declaration. Absence of Declaration or incomplete documentation may affect title clarity. Independent legal due diligence is advisable in high value transactions. Clear understanding of governance structure prevents future disputes.
Conclusion
The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act MAOA provides a structured framework for direct apartment ownership in the state. While it offers clarity of title and simplified transfer mechanisms, proper documentation and compliance remain essential. Owners must understand the Declaration, percentage interest and association bye laws to protect their rights. In redevelopment, conveyance or dispute situations, legal clarity under MAOA plays a decisive role. In Maharashtra’s evolving real estate landscape, informed ownership and statutory compliance under MAOA ensure long term security and stability for apartment owners.
FAQs on Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act MAOA
Q1. What is the purpose of Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act MAOA?
The Act provides a legal structure for individual apartment ownership along with undivided interest in common areas.
Q2. Is MAOA compulsory for all apartment buildings?
It applies when the promoter submits the property under the Act through a registered Declaration.
Q3. How is MAOA different from cooperative housing society?
Under MAOA, owners hold direct title to apartments instead of shares in a society.
Q4. Can an apartment be mortgaged under MAOA?
Yes. Since ownership is direct, apartments can be mortgaged subject to banking norms.
Q5. Who manages the building under MAOA
An Association of Apartment Owners manages common areas and administration.
MHCO Updates
Legal Metrology Amendment Rules 2026
REGULATORY UPDATE | LEGAL METROLOGY (PACKAGED COMMODITIES) AMENDMENT RULES, 2026
Contributors:
By Ms. Shreya Dalal, Associate Partner
Ms. Ananya Sakpal, Associate
India’s e-commerce compliance framework has undergone a material shift with the notification of G.S.R. 128(E) dated 13 February 2026, published in the Gazette of India. By this notification, the Central Government has amended the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 by inserting a new Rule 6(10A). The amendment introduces a platform-level obligation for e-commerce entities selling imported products, requiring that such products be made discoverable through searchable and sortable filters specifying the Country of Origin. The amendment comes into force on 1 July 2026, providing a defined compliance runway for affected entities. This change marks a clear regulatory evolution from static disclosure to digitally functional transparency.
1. Statutory Amendment
1.1. A new sub-rule 6(10A) has been inserted after Rule 6(10), which provides as follows:
“Every e-commerce entity selling imported products shall provide the product listings of such imported products in a searchable and sortable filter specifying the country of origin.”
1.2. Unlike earlier disclosure-based requirements under Rule 6, this provision expressly mandates functional visibility of country-of-origin information within the search and listing architecture of digital platforms
2. Effective Date
The amendment comes into force on 1 July 2026. This deferred commencement creates a limited but critical compliance window for Backend data restructuring, Front-end UI/UX modifications, and Seller onboarding framework updates. Given the scale of changes required, early action will be essential.
3. What Has Changed & Who is impacted?
3.1. From Disclosure to Discoverability
Prior to this amendment, country of origin disclosures was typically satisfied through:
Product description fields,
Specification tabs, or
Static label information.
The new Rule 6(10A) moves beyond this model.
3.2. E-commerce entities must now ensure that:
Country of Origin is structured as a data attribute, and
Consumers can actively search and sort products based on origin.
3.3. In simple terms, mere disclosure is no longer sufficient. The information must be:
Algorithmically discoverable, and
User-controlled.
3.4. The compliance net cast by Rule 6(10A) is deliberately wide. Impacted stakeholders include E-commerce marketplaces, Inventory-based online retailers, Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) brands importing finished goods, Importers listing products on digital platforms, Cross-border sellers operating in the Indian market, Platform operators responsible for search and listing architecture. Importantly, this is not merely a seller-side obligation. The rule squarely places responsibility on e-commerce entities, making this a platform design and systems compliance requirement.
4. Key Compliance Requirements
4.1. Under Rule 6(10A), e-commerce entities selling imported products must enable:
A Searchable Filter: Consumers must be able to search listings by country of origin (e.g., filtering products originating from a specific country).
A Sortable Filter: Consumers must be able to sort products based on country of origin as a parameter.
4.2. Both functionalities must apply specifically to imported products, requiring platforms to clearly distinguish between:
Imported SKUs, and
Domestically manufactured SKUs.
5. Strategic Regulatory Significance
5.1. Transparency as Infrastructure
The amendment embeds transparency directly into the technical infrastructure of e-commerce platforms. Country of Origin can no longer be relegated to fine print; it must be a core, query able attribute within the platform’s search ecosystem.
5.2. Consumer Empowerment
By enabling consumers to filter and sort products based on origin, the rule strengthens:
Informed purchasing decisions, and
Consumer autonomy in navigating imported versus domestic goods.
This aligns with broader consumer-protection objectives, particularly in the context of informed choice and market transparency.
5.3. Compliance Traceability
The amendment enables regulators to assess compliance by:
Auditing platform functionality, rather than
Merely inspecting product labels or individual listings.
Non-compliance will therefore be visible at the systems level, significantly lowering enforcement friction.
6. Enforcement Exposure
Failure to comply with Rule 6(10A) may attract may attract regulatory scrutiny under the Legal Metrology framework. Given the nature of the obligation, enforcement is likely to focus on:
Platform-level functionality gaps, and
Systemic non-availability of mandated filters.
As the rule is objectively verifiable through platform testing, enforcement risk is expected to be high-visibility and low-defence.
MHCO Comment:
The insertion of Rule 6(10A) represents a decisive regulatory shift from label-based compliance to architecture-based compliance in India’s e-commerce ecosystem. E-commerce entities should treat this amendment not as a routine disclosure update, but as a structural compliance mandate requiring early technical and governance alignment. With the clock running toward 1 July 2026, proactive remediation will be key to avoiding last-minute disruption and regulatory exposure.
DPIIT NOTIFICATION ON DEEP TECH STARTUPS
LEGAL UPDATE: DPIIT NOTIFICATION ON DEEP TECH STARTUPS, 2026
Contributors:
Ms. Shreya Dalal, Associate Partner
Mr. Divyang Salvi, Associate
The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (“DPIIT”) has issued a Gazette Notification dated 4 February 2026 (“2026 Notification”), replacing the startup recognition framework notified in 2019. The 2026 Notification marks a significant policy shift by formally recognising and defining “Deep Tech Startups” for the first time, while expanding eligibility thresholds and strengthening the regulatory framework for innovation-driven enterprises in India.
Introduction:
The 2026 Notification supersedes the DPIIT notification dated 19 February 2019 and reflects the Government’s intent to align India’s startup policy with research-intensive and technology-led businesses. By introducing a separate category for Deep Tech Startups, it recognises the longer development cycles, higher capital requirements and significant R&D intensity associated with advanced and emerging technology sectors.
Key Reforms Introduced under the 2026 Notification:
A key reform under the 2026 Notification is the extension of the recognition period for Deep Tech Startups to twenty years from incorporation, while the ten-year cap continues for regular startups. This extended eligibility acknowledges the longer development and commercialisation cycles typically associated with deep technology ventures. The 2026 Notification also revises turnover thresholds, increasing the ceiling from INR 100 crore to INR 200 crore for regular startups and to INR 300 crore for Deep Tech Startups, ensuring that scaling innovation-driven entities do not lose recognition prematurely.
Further, the 2026 Notification formally defines “Deep Tech Startups” for the first time as entities engaged in novel scientific or engineering innovation with significant R&D expenditure and ownership of meaningful intellectual property supported by a clear commercialisation plan. The scope of eligible entities has also been expanded to include Multi-State Cooperative Societies and State Cooperative Societies, reflecting a more inclusive approach to innovation-led enterprises.
Regulatory and Compliance Aspects:
Startup recognition will continue to be administered through the DPIIT online portal, with Deep Tech applicants are required to submit additional documentation to demonstrate compliance with prescribed eligibility criteria. While this entails enhanced scrutiny, it provides greater clarity and certainty on qualification standards. The Inter-Ministerial Board mechanism for tax-related certification under Section 80-IAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 continues under the 2026 Notification, with added flexibility in the Board’s composition, subject to approval of the Secretary, DPIIT. Restrictions on prohibited investments are retained and apply throughout the period of startup recognition. The 2026 Notification also introduces an enabling “Relaxations and Modifications” clause, allowing the Government to relax or modify conditions for specific classes of startups, thereby ensuring policy flexibility for emerging sectors.
MHCO Comment:
The 2026 Notification is a forward-looking reform that formally integrates Deep Tech into India’s startup policy framework. Extended recognition timelines, higher turnover thresholds and a clear definition of Deep Tech Startups are expected to enhance investor confidence and promote R&D-driven entrepreneurship. However, effective implementation will require alignment with foreign investment regulations, particularly for startup LLPs and funding instruments. Overall, the notification strengthens India’s innovation ecosystem and underscores a clear policy commitment to technology-led growth.
Litigation Update
LITIGATION UPDATE I SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES LIMITATION LAW FOR POSSESSION SUITS BASED ON VOID SALE DEEDS
Contributors:
Mr Akash Jain, Associate Partner
Mr Divyang Salvi, Associate
The Supreme Court of India in Shanti Devi v. Jagan Devi & Ors. (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1961) has clarified that when a property ownership dispute arises from a sale deed that is void ab initio, the lawful owner can file for possession within twelve years under Article 65 of the Limitation Act. The ruling distinguishes void from voidable documents, streamlining the remedy for owners whose property rights are threatened by fraudulent transfers and reinforcing robust legal protection for genuine titleholders.
Facts in Brief:
The case involved a longstanding dispute over agricultural land in Haryana (“Suit property”). The Plaintiffs asserted ownership of a one-third share in land, alleging that the Defendant’s possession was based on a fraudulent sale deed dated 1973, which the alleged seller (Plaintiff) had never executed. The Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction, or in the alternative, joint possession of the land, and a declaration that the sale deed was void after 11 years. The Trial Court dismissed their suit, but the first Appellate Court and the High Court ruled in their favour. The Defendant appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the suit was time-barred and that the Plaintiffs failed to prove fraud or lack of execution of the deed.
Supreme Court Findings:
The Supreme Court confined itself to the issue of whether the Plaintiff’s suit was time-barred. It held that the suit, though filed eleven years after the impugned sale deed, was governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act. The Court explained that suits for possession based on title are maintainable within twelve years when the impugned sale deed is void ab initio, and not merely voidable. The Court stressed that in such a case, the original owner’s right is not affected by a fraudulent or forged instrument, and there is no requirement to seek its cancellation within Article 59’s three-year window. The Court also highlighted the difference between fraud relating to the ‘character’ of a document (which renders it void) and as to its contents (which may make it voidable). Evidence clearly showed the Plaintiff never executed the deed or received consideration, confirming the judgment of the Lower Appellate Courts in the Plaintiff’s favour.
Impact:
This ruling clarifies the limitation law applicable in cases of fraudulent property transfers and offers practical assurance to property owners facing similar circumstances. The decision enables owners to challenge unlawful possession based on forged or fraudulent documents for up to twelve years after adverse possession begins, expanding access to remedy. By reinforcing the distinction between void and voidable transactions, the Court’s decision will streamline property litigation and strengthen legal certainty in title disputes. Stakeholders—in particular, landowners—must ensure careful record-keeping and timely action if their property rights are infringed by such transactions.
MHCO Comment:
The Supreme Court’s approach brings much-needed clarity to real estate litigation involving fraudulent sale deeds. By recognising the extended limitation window for actions based on void documents and minimising procedural hurdles, the ruling affirms substantive justice and legal security for legitimate landowners. The judgment will promote diligence, transparency, and fair outcomes in property disputes, contributing to overall real estate market stability in India.
Gaming Law Update
GAMING LAW UPDATE: PROMOTION AND REGULATION OF ONLINE GAMING ACT, 2025
Contributors:
Mr Bhushan Shah, Partner,
Ms Shreya Dalal, Associate Partner
Mr Abhishek Nair, Associate
On 22 August 2025, the Central Government enacted the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 (“Gaming Act”). The Bill was passed by Parliament with remarkable speed, within seven minutes in the Lok Sabha and twenty-six minutes in the Rajya Sabha, before receiving Presidential assent the following day. The Gaming Act provides for the promotion of e-sports and online social games, while prohibiting online money games involving stakes or wagers for monetary gain. It also establishes a regulatory authority to oversee the sector and sets out stringent penalties for violations.
Recognition and Promotion of E-Sports and Social Games
The Gaming Act empowers the Central Government to formally recognise e-sports as a legitimate competitive sport. It may issue guidelines, establish training academies, provide incentives, and coordinate with States to promote such activities. Online social games designed for entertainment or educational purposes and not involving monetary stakes are also to be facilitated through registration mechanisms, awareness initiatives, and institutional support programmes.
Definitions under the Act
The Act introduces the following key definitions:
Online game: any game offered on a digital platform.
E-sport: skill-based competitive events without wagering.
Online social game: non-wagering, entertainment, or skill-development based online games.
Online money game: any game involving fees, deposits, or stakes in expectation of monetary or equivalent returns, excluding e-sports.
Recognition and Promotion of E-Sports and Social Games
The Gaming Act empowers the Central Government to recognise e-sports as a legitimate competitive sport through guidelines, training academies, incentives, and coordination with States. Both e-sports and online social games are subject to registration with the designated Authority, which may impose technical and playerprotection standards. Online social games for entertainment or educational purposes without monetary stakes will be promoted through registration mechanisms, awareness initiatives, and institutional support.
Prohibition of Online Money Games
The Gaming Act imposes a complete prohibition on offering, operating, advertising, or participating in online money games, including those offered from foreign jurisdictions. Banks and financial institutions are also prohibited from facilitating related transactions.
Penalties for violations:
Up to three years’ imprisonment and fines up to ₹1 crore for offering online money games or facilitating funds for online money games.
Up to two years’ imprisonment and fines up to ₹50 lakh for advertising online money games.
Enhanced punishments for repeat offences.
Non-compliance with directions may lead to penalties up to ₹10 lakh, suspension, or cancellation of registration. Offences under the prohibition of online money games are cognizable and non-bailable, and company officers may also be held liable. The Act further empowers investigation, search, and seizure (including of digital resources), and blocking of non-compliant services.
Authority and Regulatory Oversight
The Central Government may establish or designate an Authority to classify games, register permissible ones, address complaints, and issue directions.
MHCO Comment
The Gaming Act provides a comprehensive framework for the regulation of online gaming in India. It balances the encouragement of e-sports and social games with stringent restrictions on money-based gaming. However, the Gaming Act has already had a disruptive impact on the industry as leading platforms such as WinZO, Dream11, MPL, and PokerBaazi have already suspended their real-money offerings immediately following the enactment of the said Act, in a sector employing over 20 million people. By effectively shutting down the largest revenue-generating segment of the online gaming industry, the Gaming Act is eroding the growth in the sector. We believe that the Central Government ought to have issued market policy consultation papers and taken public comments before drastically resorting to passing the Gaming Act in such a hasty manner.
2025 - MANSUKHLAL HIRALAL & CO.
Need Help? Chat with us








